India High Range Mountain Landscape Project | Accountability Console
Complaints IAMs Register Login


India High Range Mountain Landscape Project


Consultation and disclosure

Description: Complaint raises concerns regarding inadequate or absent consultation about or disclosure of project information, including project impacts and/or mitigation plans.

Complaints with this Issue: 451

Browse Complaints


Description: Complaint raises concerns about corruption and/or fraud related to the project. Most IAMs cannot address corruption or fraud concerns.

Complaints with this Issue: 23

Browse Complaints

Due diligence

Description: Complaint raises concerns about inadequate or absent prior investigation of project impacts.

Complaints with this Issue: 429

Browse Complaints


Description: Complaint raises concerns about impacts that do not fit in one of the other categories. Complaints about which there is no publicly available information regarding the issues raised are also included.

Complaints with this Issue: 169

Browse Complaints


Conservation and environmental protection

Description: Project relates to preservation or management of the natural environment, legal frameworks regarding environmental protection or pollution, and carbon sequestration or other climate change mitigation activities.

Complaints in this Sector: 53

Browse Complaints

Land reform

Description: Project relates to development of or changes to legal frameworks regarding land tenure.

Complaints in this Sector: 26

Browse Complaints


Name: India High Range Mountain Landscape Project

Investments: UNDP 00087493

Client: Government of India, Government of Kerala


Country: India


IAM: Stakeholder Response Mechanism (SRM)

ID: SRM0001

Date Filed: Dec. 10, 2015

Status: Monitoring


The complaints state concern that, among other things, there was improper consultation and exclusion of relevant stakeholders during the design and formulation of the project. It expresses concern that stakeholders' rights, such as the requirement of Free, Prior, Informed Consent and certain relevant national laws, were not properly adhered to when formulating the project. The complainant further states that people potentially affected by the project protest and are apathetic to the project, and that the project documentation improperly refers to relevant lands as protected areas when in fact they are not.

Complaint Stages


Dec. 10, 2015



Start Date: Dec. 10, 2015


Dec. 10, 2015 -

Dec. 16, 2015


Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Dec. 10, 2015

End Date: Dec. 16, 2015


Dec. 16, 2015 -

April 18, 2016


Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Dec. 16, 2015

End Date: April 18, 2016

Dispute Resolution

Aug. 16, 2016 -

Nov. 3, 2017

Dispute Resolution

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Aug. 16, 2016

End Date: Nov. 3, 2017

Compliance Review

Not Undertaken

Compliance Review

Status: Not Undertaken

Start Date: None

Has Compliance Report: No

Non-Compliance Found: No


Nov. 3, 2017


Status: In Progress

Start Date: Nov. 3, 2017


Not Closed