Motorway A-2, Poland Confirmatory | Accountability Console
Complaints IAMs Register Login

Loading...

Motorway A-2, Poland Confirmatory

Issues

Consultation and disclosure

Description: Complaint raises concerns regarding inadequate or absent consultation about or disclosure of project information, including project impacts and/or mitigation plans.

Complaints with this Issue: 538

Browse Complaints

Displacement (physical and/or economic)

Description: Complaint raises concerns about physical relocation, loss of shelter, and/or loss of assets that relate to income or livelihood.

Complaints with this Issue: 494

Browse Complaints

Sectors

Infrastructure

Description: Project relates to construction or improvement of large structures, facilities, or public works projects. Examples include roads and other transportation projects, sanitation and water treatment facilities, power plants, and industrial facilities.

Complaints in this Sector: 995

Browse Complaints

Project

Name: Motorway A-2

Investments: EIB

Client:

Support: Loans

Country: Poland

Complaint

IAM: Complaints Mechanism (CM)

ID: SG/E/2010/09

Date Filed: July 10, 2010

Date Closed: Sept. 30, 2010

Status: Closed With Outputs

Description

The confirmatory complaint alleges that the EIB-CM’s Conclusions Report of 3 June 2010 is wrong when it claims that neither Directive 85/337/EEC nor Directive 92/337/EEC apply to implementing the construction of A-2 Swiecko - Nowy Tomysl Motorway in Poland, as the date of issue of the building permits determines whether the above-mentioned Directives apply to the contested Project. Moreover the complainant confirms his allegations that the Promoter of the project violated property rights as land-parcels that had been expropriated for the building of the to Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A.had been unlawfully disposed of. Thirdly the confirmatory complaint challenges the adequacy of the public consultation, notably the failure to notify the issue of decisions/permits for the contested Project to Project-affected people as this ought to have been published in both local newspapers and not only in one of them.

Complaint Stages

Filing

July 10, 2010

Filing

Status:

Start Date: July 10, 2010

Registration

July 10, 2010 -

July 10, 2010

Registration

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: July 10, 2010

End Date: July 10, 2010

Eligibility

Closed With Output

Eligibility

Status: Closed With Output

Explanation: Outside of mandate

Dispute Resolution

Not Undertaken

Dispute Resolution

Status: Not Undertaken

Explanation: Case closed in earlier stage; Unknown

Compliance Review

July 10, 2010 -

Sept. 24, 2010

Compliance Review

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: July 10, 2010

End Date: Sept. 24, 2010

Has Compliance Report: No

Non-Compliance Found: No

Monitoring

Not Undertaken

Monitoring

Status: Not Undertaken

Explanation: Case closed in earlier stage; Outside of mandate, Bank not found to be responsible party

Closed

Sept. 30, 2010

Timeline

Related Complaints

Project IAM Country Date Filed Status
Motorway A-2, Poland EIB CM Poland 03/12/2009 Closed With Outputs