Complaint > Promoting Economic Use of Customary Land and Grant No. 0392 (SAM): Samoa Agribusiness Support Project

Dispute Resolution: Summary of the Review and Assessment Report

...financial institutions will provide sub loans to eligible agribusinesses, with ADB funds providing cash collateral to secure up to 50% of such loans. ADB funding will also provide up to 25% of total subproject costs in repayable supplemental seed capital, provided as “quasi-equity” in a business, and can be used only if the business would then qualify for a loan. Commercial banks will then finance the remaining portion of the project according to their own standards. The financing component...

Complaint > Community Empowerment for Rural Development Project

Dispute Resolution: SPF's Final Report (English)

...Financial and Economic Institutions, Component C – Improving Rural Infrastructure, and Component D – Management & Monitoring. In 2002 project implementation, the communities of several of the CERD Project target villages in South Kalimantan felt that the CERD Project had violated project design, principles and approach (desain, prinsip dan pendekatan proyek), with implications for these communities. Efforts to resolve this problem were made between March 2003 and December 2004, beginning a...

Complaint > CAREC Transport Corridor I Investment Program

Dispute Resolution: Review and Assessment Report (RAR) (English)

...financial institutions). 6 C. Identification of Issues 22. Depending on the stakeholders' perception and situation, they mentioned different sets of concerns — some related to concrete physical expectations and changes, others to a broader view of the project or the context within which it operates. This section summarizes the views expressed by the various stakeholders and organizes them around a manageable set of the...

Complaint > Community Empowerment for Rural Development Project

Dispute Resolution: Review and Assessment Report (RAR) (English)

...financial management of the early CERDP activities, trust and confidence of villagers in their local governments seem eroded in a number of cases. It is not clear, whether frictions and disputes among individuals are rooted in project-related issues, or evolved out of other concerns. Open discussions seem to be rather the exception than the rule in village level disputes. It is generally agreed among government, consultants, IRM and communities that capacity-building for decentralized devel...