Mumbai Urban Transport Project | Accountability Console
Complaints IAMs Register Login

Mumbai Urban Transport Project

Issues

Community health and safety

Description: Complaint raises concerns related to public health and safety including incidents of or an increase in accidents, release of hazardous materials, and spread of diseases. Concerns related to retaliation and/or violence are not included.

Complaints with this Issue: 368

Browse Complaints

Consultation and disclosure

Description: Complaint raises concerns regarding inadequate or absent consultation about or disclosure of project information, including project impacts and/or mitigation plans.

Complaints with this Issue: 551

Browse Complaints

Displacement (physical and/or economic)

Description: Complaint raises concerns about physical relocation, loss of shelter, and/or loss of assets that relate to income or livelihood.

Complaints with this Issue: 509

Browse Complaints

Livelihoods

Description: Complaint raises concerns about impacts on the means by which people make a living, including wage-based income, trade and bartering, agriculture, fishing, foraging, and other natural-resource based means.

Complaints with this Issue: 357

Browse Complaints

Pollution

Description: Complaint raises concerns about releases of pollutants related to the project, including hazardous or non-hazardous chemicals, minerals, metals, pathogens, odors, noise, vibration, radiation, light, and heat.

Complaints with this Issue: 234

Browse Complaints

Sectors

Infrastructure

Description: Project relates to construction or improvement of large structures, facilities, or public works projects. Examples include roads and other transportation projects, sanitation and water treatment facilities, power plants, and industrial facilities.

Complaints in this Sector: 1030

Browse Complaints

Regulatory Development

Description: Project relates specifically to development or reform of legal frameworks, including laws and regulations.

Complaints in this Sector: 174

Browse Complaints

Project

Name: Mumbai Urban Transport Project

Investments: WB

Client:

Support: Loans

Country: India

Complaint

IAM: Inspection Panel (Panel)

ID: 32

Date Filed: April 28, 2004

Date Closed: Sept. 30, 2013

Status: Closed With Outputs

Description

The Requesters are small shop owners whose commercial premises are located at the Kismat Nagar area, Kurla West, in the city of Mumbai. They were instructed by the implementing agency of the Project, the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (hereinafter “MMRDA”) to move their commercial structures from their current location to a distant location without consultation and without their consent. The Requesters claim that they will suffer adverse effects due to the negligence and failure of the Bank to follow its operational policies and procedures with respect to their being relocated and rehabilitated as a result of the Project. The Requesters state that on January 30, 2004, MMRDA wrote to the Kismat Nagar Welfare Association directing that the Requesters remove their commercial structures at Kismat Nagar because of proposed Project works involving the widening of the existing road. They were further informed that Mankhurd would be the site of their proposed relocation. The Requesters contended that Mankhurd is too distant from their present site to be a satisfactory relocation site under Bank policy on involuntary resettlement, and asked that they be relocated to open plots of land at the BandraKurla Complex area closer to their present site or “under the nearby slum rehabilitation projects.” The Requesters also claim that “ our rights to participation and consultation were effectively denied and that our attempts to raise our concerns were not successful…” They also claim “ that the failure to provide income restoration would result in harm. This failure would destroy our livelihoods, causing us to dismantle our productive sources and cause our supporting networks and kin groups to disperse.” The Requesters cite OP/BP 4.12 – Involuntary Resettlement in claiming that they are entitled to be “ assisted in efforts to improve their livelihood or at least restore them in real terms to pre-displacement levels or to levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation whichever is higher.” In a meeting with Bank staff on March 25, 2004, and in a letter to the Bank dated March 26, 2004, and enclosed with the Request, the Requesters asked the Bank for a number of things: that they be provided with proper information; that their structures be relocated to the open space available at Bandra-Kurla Complex; that they be provided with the equivalent area consumed under the Project when relocated; that the actual area of each shop whose relocation is required by the Project be disclosed publicly; that an actual survey of the shops be conducted; and that the “ rights of all our members be crystallized.” The Requesters did not receive a satisfactory response from the Bank. The Requesters claim that the Bank has violated its policies and procedures on involuntary resettlement and project supervision, and that their rights to participation and consultation and income restoration have been denied. The Requesters ask that an investigation be recommended to the Bank’s Board of Executive Directors. The above claims may constitute violations by the Bank of various provisions of the following operational Policies and Procedures: OD 4.01 on Environmental Assessment OD/OP/BP 13.05 on Project Supervision OP/BP 17.50 on Disclosure of Information OP/BP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement

Complaint Stages

Filing

April 28, 2004

Filing

Status:

Start Date: April 28, 2004

Registration

April 28, 2004 -

April 29, 2004

Registration

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: April 28, 2004

End Date: April 29, 2004

Eligibility

April 29, 2004 -

Sept. 3, 2004

Eligibility

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: April 29, 2004

End Date: Sept. 3, 2004

Dispute Resolution

Not Undertaken

Dispute Resolution

Status: Not Undertaken

Explanation: Not offered by mechanism, Dispute resolution was not an option in this case

Compliance Review

Sept. 3, 2004 -

Aug. 3, 2006

Compliance Review

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Sept. 3, 2004

End Date: Aug. 3, 2006

Has Compliance Report: Yes

Non-Compliance Found: Yes

Monitoring

Aug. 14, 2006 -

Sept. 14, 2013

Monitoring

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Aug. 14, 2006

End Date: Sept. 14, 2013

Closed

Sept. 30, 2013

Timeline

Documents

Commitments