DTS Expressway II | Accountability Console
Complaints IAMs Register Login

Loading...

DTS Expressway II

Issues

Community health and safety

Description: Complaint raises concerns related to public health and safety including incidents of or an increase in accidents, release of hazardous materials, and spread of diseases. Concerns related to retaliation and/or violence are not included.

Complaints with this Issue: 359

Browse Complaints

Consultation and disclosure

Description: Complaint raises concerns regarding inadequate or absent consultation about or disclosure of project information, including project impacts and/or mitigation plans.

Complaints with this Issue: 525

Browse Complaints

Cultural heritage

Description: Complaint raises concerns about impacts on any type of tangible or intangible cultural heritage, including significant sites, unique environmental features, cultural knowledge, and traditional lifestyles.

Complaints with this Issue: 117

Browse Complaints

Due diligence

Description: Complaint raises concerns about inadequate or absent prior investigation of project impacts.

Complaints with this Issue: 482

Browse Complaints

Sectors

Infrastructure

Description: Project relates to construction or improvement of large structures, facilities, or public works projects. Examples include roads and other transportation projects, sanitation and water treatment facilities, power plants, and industrial facilities.

Complaints in this Sector: 964

Browse Complaints

Project

Name: DTS Expressway II

Investments: EIB

Client:

Support: Loans

Country: Poland

Complaint

IAM: Complaints Mechanism (CM)

ID: SG/E/2010/01

Date Filed: Jan. 15, 2010

Date Closed: Jan. 11, 2011

Status: Closed Without Outputs

Description

The complainant alleged that the project would be implemented in breach of the EIA Directive, EU legislation and the Aarhus convention due to the lack of consideration for alternatives for the currently contested sections during the public consultations. An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) had not been presented during these public consultations and the only criterion that had been taken into account in the Social Impact Report had been the number of buildings which would be demolished. The complainant alleged, moreover, that historical heritage and negative impact on residents’ health had not been taken into account.

Complaint Stages

Filing

Jan. 15, 2010

Filing

Status:

Start Date: Jan. 15, 2010

Registration

Jan. 15, 2010 -

Jan. 15, 2010

Registration

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Jan. 15, 2010

End Date: Jan. 15, 2010

Eligibility

Jan. 29, 2010 -

April 28, 2010

Eligibility

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Jan. 29, 2010

End Date: April 28, 2010

Dispute Resolution

Not Undertaken

Dispute Resolution

Status: Not Undertaken

Explanation: Mechanism deemed involvement unnecessary

Compliance Review

April 28, 2010 -

Jan. 3, 2011

Compliance Review

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: April 28, 2010

End Date: Jan. 3, 2011

Has Compliance Report: No

Non-Compliance Found: No

Monitoring

Not Undertaken

Monitoring

Status: Not Undertaken

Explanation: Case closed in earlier stage

Closed

Jan. 11, 2011

Timeline

Involved Groups

Name Complaints Group Type
Gliwiczanie dla Gliwic society 1 Local CSO